The basic rules to be
followed and various requirements to be
satisfied for masonry construction are specified in
the codes of practice for structural masonry construction.
This particular document is based on the European structural
design codes - EC6 and EC8. Eurocode 6 specifies the rules
and provisions for structural masonry.
Additional provisions to be considered for
masonry construction in earthquake prone areas are
outlined in Eurocode 8. In this portion of the website is discussed
improved form of brick masonry, namely confined masonry.
In this system the masonry walls are confined with reinforced members,
however the walls themselves carry all of the gravity and lateral loads.
With the increased popularity and availability of reinforced concrete and reinforced block masonry,
this type of construction has become common for low-rise houses
in many areas of Latin America, Indian Subcontinent and Asia as well as in some parts
of Europe.
Although an improved masonry system, it is vulnerable to earthquakes when
not well conceived. The following main points should be covered for
an earthquake resistant construction :
|
|
| Materials for confined masonry construction |
| Masonry units |
EC6 provides
specifications regarding the use of the following masonry
units:
- Fired clay units
- Fired clay lightweight units
- Calcium silicate units
- Concrete block units
- Lightweight concrete block units
- Autoclaved aerated concrete units
|
| The
properties of masonry units should comply with the
requirements of relevant European standards (EN
771-1-6). Masonry units are classified into the
following types: solid, perforated unit, hollow unit,
cellular unit, horizontally perforated unit- see Figure 1. |
|
|
Figure 1- Types of masonry units (7) |
| Solid
masonry units are either units without recesses or units
with recesses that are filled with mortar during
construction, or units with up to 25% by volume of
vertical holes. Considering the total volume of holes,
volume of any hole, area of any hole, as well as
combined thickness of webs and shells, EC6 provides the
following classification (Table 1): |
| Criteria |
1 |
2a |
2b |
3 |
Volume of holes (% of the gross volume)1 |
<=25 |
>25-45 for clay units, >25-50 for concrete aggregate units |
>45-55 for clay units, >50-60 for concrete aggregate units2 |
<=70 |
Volume of any hole(% of the gross volume) |
<=12.5 |
<=12.5 for clay units, <=25 for concrete aggregate units |
<=12.5 for clay units, <=25 for concrete aggregate units2 |
Limited by (see below) |
Area of any hole |
Limited by volume (see above) |
Limited by volume (see above) |
Limited by volume (see above) |
<=2800mm2 except units with a single hole when the hole should be <=18000mm2 |
Combined thickness (% of the overall width)3 |
>=37.5 |
>=30 |
>=20 |
No requirement |
Notes: 1.
Holes may consist of formed vertical holes through
the unit or frogs or recesses. 2. If there is national
experience, based on tests, that confirms that the
safety of the masonry is not reduced unacceptably
when a higher proportion of holes is incorporated,
the limit of 55% for clay units and 60% for
concrete aggregate units may be increased for
masonry units that are used in the country with
national experience. 3.The combined thickness is the thickness of webs
and shells, measured horizontally across the unit
at right angles to the face of the wall | |
|
Table 1- EC 6 requirements for the grouping of masonry units |
| This classification is employed to
select the corection factor K in cases where the
characteristic compressive strength fk and shear strength
fvk of the masonry are
calculated on the basis of empirical formulae
correlating normalised compressive strength of masonry
units fb and mortar fm. |
EC 8 provides further requirements
for hollow units used for earthquake resistant masonry
construction as listed:
- The units have less than 50% holes(in % of gross volume)
- Minimum thickness of shells is 15mm
- The vertical webs in hollow and cellular units extend over the entire horizontal
length of the unit
|
In the relevant European standards
(EN 771-1-6) are given minimum mean values of
compressive strength of masonry units to be used for
masonry walls:
- Clay units: min fb=2.5 MPa
- Calcium silicate units: min fb=5.0 MPa
- Concrete units: min fb=1.8 MPa
- Autoclaved aerated concrete units: min fb=1.8 MPa
- Manufactured stone units: min fb=15 MPa
|
According to the EC 8, the minimum
normalised compressive strength of masonry unit, normal
to the bed face, is fb=2.5 MPa. In the case of
hollow clay units and concrete block units it is
recommended that the minimum compressive strength is 7.5
MPa, especially for reinforced masonry walls
construction. EC 6 suggests the use of normalised
compressive strength fb
for design. This is the mean value determined by testing
of at least ten equivalent, air dried, 100 mm by 100 mm
specimens cut from the masonry unit. In the case where
the strength is obtained by testing full sized units,
the mean value of strength is multiplied by the shape
factor d,
which takes into account the actual dimensions of the
unit. In case the compressive stength of masonry is
specified as characteristic strength, it should be first
converted to the mean equivalent using a conversion
factor based on the coefficient of variation, and than
multiplied by the shape factor d (Table 2). |
| Shape factor d
for conversion of mean value of unit's strength to normalised value (EC6) |
| Height [mm] |
Least horizontal dimension [mm] |
| 50 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
>250 |
| 50 |
0.85 |
0.75 |
0.70 |
- |
- |
| 65 |
0.95 |
0.85 |
0.75 |
0.70 |
0.65 |
| 100 |
1.15 |
1.00 |
0.90 |
0.80 |
0.75 |
| 150 |
1.30 |
1.20 |
1.10 |
1.00 |
0.95 |
| 200 |
1.45 |
1.35 |
1.25 |
1.15 |
1.10 |
| >250 |
1.55 |
1.45 |
1.35 |
1.25 |
1.15 | |
|
Table 2- Shape factor for
conversion of mean value of unit's strength to
normalised value (4) |
| Mortar |
According to the specification used
in EC 6, several types of mortar can be used for masonry
walls:
- General purpose mortar, used in joints with thickness greater than 3mm and produced with dense aggregate
- Thin layer mortar, which is designed for use in masonry with nominal thickness of joints 1-3mm
- Lightweight mortar, which is made using perlite, expanded clay, expanded shale etc.
Lightweight mortars typically have a dry hardened density lower than 1500kg/m3.
|
| In the Table 3 below are shown
typical composition of prescribed general purpose mortar
mixes and expected mean compressive strength. |
| Mortar type |
Mean compresive strength |
Approximate composition in
parts of volume |
| Cement |
Hydrated lime |
Sand |
| M2 |
2.5 MPa |
1 |
1.25-2.50 |
2.25-3 times cement and lime |
| M5 |
5 MPa |
1 |
0.50-1.25 |
| M10 |
10 MPa |
1 |
0.25-0.50 |
| M20 |
20 MPa |
1 |
0-0.25 | |
|
Table 3- Typical prescribed
composition and strength of general purpose
mortars (39) |
| Mortars to be used in masonry
construction in earthquake regions should comply with EC
8. According to this standard for the construction of
plain and confined masonry, the minimum compressive
strength of mortar fm is
set to 5 MPa. Confined masonry walls can be reinforced with bed
joint reinforcement, which is anchored in the tie-columns.
In such cases mortar with minimum compressive strength of 10 MPa
is required, since the rebars are embedded in mortar. The bond strength is
specified as a function of type of rebar and type of
mortar. The recommended values of characteristic bond
strength fbok are
specified in the Table 4 below: |
| Mortar |
M5-M9 |
M10-M14 |
M15-M19 |
M20 |
fbok for plain bars [MPa] |
0.7 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
fbok for high- bond bars [MPa] |
1 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
2.5 | |
|
Table 4- Characteristic anchorage
bond strength of reinforcement in mortar (4) |
| Mechanical properties of mortar are
determined by testing mortar prisms 40x40x160mm
(EN1015-11). The compressive strength of the mortar is
calculated after averaging the strength values of six
specimens. The thickness of bed and head joints is
recommended to be in the range 8-15mm and all head
joints should be fully filled with mortar. |
| Reinforcing steel |
Steel bars are used as
reinforcement in the case of reinforced masonry and
confined masonry. According to EC 6, reinforcing steel
may be assumed to possess adequate elongation ductility,
if the following requirements are satisfied:
- for high dutility class: euk > 5% and (ft/fy)k > 1.08
- for normal dutility class: euk > 2.5% and (ft/fy)k > 1.05,
|
where: e
uk= the characteristic value
of the unit elongation at max tensile stress,
ft=
tensile strength of rebar steel,
fy=
yield strength of rebar steel,
(ft/fy)k = the characteristic value
of ft/fy |
| In the case where high bond rebars
with diameter less than 6mm is used it should not be
considered as having high ductility. When prefabricated
ladder-type or truss-type bed joint reinforcement is
used it should be considered as having normal ducility.
Typical anchorages of reinforcing bars are shown on Figure 2. |
|
|
Figure 2- Typical anchorages of reinforcing bars (4) |
| Definition of confined masonry construction system |
| To beginning of document |
| A constructioin system where a plain masonry walls are
confined on all four sides by RC members or reinforced
masonry is called confined masonry. The major
imrovements in the performance of the confined masonry
building over the plain masonry building are as follows: |
- Enhances greatly the
connection between structural walls
- Improves the stability of
masonry walls
- Improves the strength of
masonry walls
- Provides ductility under
earthquake loading
- Improves the integrity and
containment of earthquake damaged masonry walls
|
The RC
confining elements are horizontal members called
bond-beams and vertical members called tie-columns (Figure 3).
In the case of confined masonry floors should be reinforced concrete cast in-situ.
Good floor to wall connection is achieved by horizontal bond beams cast just below slabs. |
|
|
Figure 3- Solid units masonry confined with tie-columns and bond beams |
RC
confining elements are mostly used for solid masonry
units construction. When masonry units from group 2a or
2b are used the horizontal and vertical confining
elements are formed by reinforced concrete block masonry
units which are subsequently grouted. For appropriate details for these
refer the Confined block masonry section of this website.
The confining elements are not
intended nor designed to perform as a moment-resisting
frames. When such frames are constructed to resist
lateral and vertical loads the purpose of the masonry
walls is only for space partitioning, and the
construction system is called masonry-infilled frames.
In the masonry-infilled frames type of housing the
reinforced concrete frame structure is constructed
first. The masonry is constructed later between the RC
members. In the case of confined masonry, the masonry
walls are load-bearing and are constructed to carry all of the gravity loads as well
as lateral loads.
Therefore the load-bearing masonry
walls are constructed first. Then the vertical and
horizontal confining elements are cast simultaneously with the floors,
which are constructed as RC slab. |
| In
order to achieve effective confinement of walls,
vertical confining elements( tie-columns) should be
located at all corners and changes of wall contour, and
at all joints, wall intersections and free ends of
structural walls. Vertical confining members are also
necessary at both sides of any opening which according
to EC 8 has an area more than 1.5 m2. According to [TOMASEVIC
REFERENCE] this requirement can be relaxed for openings
area up to 2.5 m2. The
distance between tie-columns should not exceed 4.0 m.
Figure 4, below shows typical distribution of vertical confining elements in the plan of the building. |
|
|
Figure 4- Typical distribution of vertical confining elements in the plan of a building |
Normally the tie-columns fit into
the thickness of masonry wall and the minimum tie-column
cross section is 150x150 mm. The concrete for the
confining members should be min grade C15. According to
EC 6, the contribution of the tie-columns and bond-beams
to the lateral resistance of the masonry house should
not be taken into account. Consequently specific design
calculations for confining elements are not required.
The amount of reinforcement in vertical and horizontal
confining elements is determined on empirical basis.
The
min steel tie-columns reinforcement for construction in
seismic zones is specified in EC 8. According to this
code the min reinforcement area for tie-columns is 240
mm2. For tie-columns at
the house corners and wall intersections, it is
recommended that, at least 4 f10 mild steel bars are used
for reinforcement. In this case the total steel area is
314 mm2. Mild steel
stirrups f10 are placed uniformly
distributed at 200 mm offsets.
Although the tie-columns and bond
beams do not provide frame system adequate splicing and
anchoring of rebars is required at all joints. Sixty
rebar diameters splices are required according to EC
8.
In some resources[10] is
provided tabulated data where the area or rebars can be
selected in dependence of seismicity of the location and
nuber of storeys in the house. Such data is presented
below in Table 5 for tie-columns. |
No of storeys |
Low: ag < 0.1g |
Moderate: 0.1g < ag < 0.2g |
High: 0.2g < ag < 0.4g |
| 2 |
1-2 |
4f8 |
4f10 |
4f12 |
| 4 |
1-2 |
4f8 |
4f10 |
4f12 |
| 4 |
2-4 |
4f8 |
4f10 |
4f12 |
| 6 |
1-2 |
4f10 |
4f12 |
4f14 |
| 6 |
3-4 |
4f8 |
4f10 |
4f12 |
| 6 |
5-6 |
4f8 |
4f10 |
4f12 | |
|
Table 5- Recommended
reinforcement for vertical confining elements (9) |
| To
enforce the confinement of plane masonry by the
confining members EC 8 requires connecting the masonry
and tie-columns by means of rebar diameter f6 min at max
600 mm appart. These links should be anchored at least
250 mm into the mortar joints. |
Brick masonry should be constructed following
simple instructions for quality workmanship:
- In dry and hot climate,
masonry units should be soaked in water before the
construction in order to prevent quick drying and
shrinkage of cement based mortars
- Masonry units should be
assembled together in overlapped fashion (see Figure 5 and Figure 6) so that the vertical joints are
staggered from course to course. To ensure adequate
bonding the units should overlap by a lenght equal to
0.4 times the height of unit or 40 mm, whichever is
the greater.
- Same type of masonry units
and mortar should be used for structural walls in the
same storey
- Bracing walls should be
constructed in the same time as the load-bearing walls
- The thickness of individual
walls is kept constant from storey to storey
- In cases where general
purpose mortar is going to be used, the mortar joints
thickness should be between 8 and 15 mm.
|
EC 8
specifies that, in seismic zones, the load-bearing
masonry wall thickness should be min 240 mm when the masonry
is confined. To ensure stability of walls, the ratio of the effective
wall height to wall thickness should be max 15. |
| To
ensure load bearing capacity of masonry walls with
openings the length of a structural wall should be at
least 1/3 of the greater clear height of the openings
adjacent to the wall in the case of confined masonry. |
|
|
Figure 5- Flemish bond for one brick thick wall |
|
|
Figure 6- English bond for one brick thick wall |
| Mechanical properties for verification of masonry walls |
| To beginning of document |
| This part of the document explains the mechanical properties of masonry
for verification of masonry walls. This section is included in cases where engineered building is required. |
| Earthquake resistance of masonry walls |
In the event of an earthquake, apart from the existing gravity loads, horizontal racking loads are imposed on walls.
However, the unreinforced masonry behaves as a brittle material. Hence if the stress state within the wall exceeds masonry strength, brittle failure occurs,
followed by possible collapse of the wall and the building. Therefore unreinforced masonry walls are vulnerable to earthquakes,
and should be confined and/or reinforced whenever possible.
Masonry walls resisting in-plane loads usually exhibit the following three modes of failure:
- Sliding shear- a wall with poor shear strength, loaded predominantly with horizontal forces
can exhibit this failure mechanism. Aspect ratio for such walls is usually 1:1 or less (1:1.5)
- Shear- a wall loaded with significant vertical load as well as horizontal forces can fail in shear.
This is the most common mode of failure. Aspect ratio for such walls is usually about 1:1. Shear failure
can also occur for panels with bigger aspect ratio ie. 2:1, in cases of big vertical load.
- Bending- this type of failure can occur if walls are with improved shear resistance.
For bigger aspect ratios ie. 2:1 bending failure can occur due to small vertical loads, rather than
high shear resistance. In this mode of failure the masonry panel can rock like a rigid body (in cases of low
vertical loads).
Failure modes for masonry walls subject to in-plane loads are shown on Figure 7 |
|
|
Figure 7- Failure modes for masonry walls subject to in-plane loads |
| Mechanical properties |
In order to estimate the resistance of masonry walls, the following mechanical properties for
the masonry needs to be determined:
- The compressive strength- f
- The shear strength- fv
- The bending strength- fx
- The stress-strain relationship, s-e
|
Other essential mechanical characteristics of masonry:
- The tensile strength- ft, as an equivalent to shear strength- fv
- The modulus of elasticity- E
- The shear modulus- G
- The ductility factor- m
|
| The ductility factor is determined
only for a specific structural element(specific
proportions, boundary conditions etc). It cannot be
determined for the masonry itself. Mechanical
characteristics of masonry are determined by testing
standard specimens of masonry wallets and walls
according to code EN 1052. |
| Compressive strength |
Compressive strength is
determined by testing masonry specimens of at least 1.5
units length and 3 units height or by testing walls of
1.0-1.8 m length and 2.4-2.7 m height.
In cases where
the masonry specimen is slender(height/thickness>20),
lateral displacements at the mid height of the wall are
measured. The slenderness can be taken into account
using the measured value for this displacement d and the
thickness of the wall t. Thus the measured compressive
strength can be increased by the following factor:
t/(t-d),
provided the increase is not more than 15%.
According to
EN 1052-1 three identical specimens are tested and the
results evaluated. In cases where the measured mean
compressive strength f of masonry is different from the
one of its constituents( masonry units and mortar) by
25% the value of f is modified. The characteristic
compressive strength of masonry fk is determined as the
smaller value of either fk=f/1.2 or fk=fmin.
When verifying load
bearing masonry and test data is not available, the
characteristic compressive strength of plain masonry
made with general purpose mortar may be calculated on
the basis of normalised compressive strength of masonry
units fb and compressive
strength of mortar fm as
follows: |
| fk = K*(fb0.65)*(fm0.25) [MPa], |
and fm is less than 20 MPa
or 2fb, whichever is the
smaller. The value of constant K depends on the
classification of masonry units into groups as per Table 1.
Below are shown recommended values for K:
- 0.60 for group 1 masonry units in a wall without longitudinal mortar joint,
- 0.55 for group 2a masonry units in a wall without longitudinal mortar joint,
- 0.50 for group 2b masonry units in a wall without longitudinal mortar joint, and
for group 1 masonry units in a wall with longitudinal mortar joint,
- 0.45 for group 2a masonry units in a wall with longitudinal mortar joint,
- 0.40 for group 2b masonry units in a wall with longitudinal mortar joint, and
for group 3 masonry units
|
| Shear strength |
| Shear strength of masonry is
defined as a combination of initial shear strength under
zero compressive load and increase in strength due to
compressive stresses perpendicular to the shear plane.
Initial shear strength at zero compressive stress is
denoted with fvko. This
property is determined according to EN 1052-3 by testing
a triplet specimen such that only shear stresses develop
in the mortar to masonry unit contact planes. A minimum
of five triplets are tested. The minimum acceptable
value of fvko is 0.03
MPa. The characteristic shear strength of plain masonry
is then calculated as follows: |
| fvk = fvko+0.4*sd, |
| where sd is the design compressive
stress perpendicular to the shear plane. The value of
sd should be greater than
0.065fb and a limiting
value specified in EC 6 depending on masonry unit's
group and mortar quality. In Table 4, are shown
typical values of initial shear strength at zero
compression fvko and
limiting values of characteristic shear strength fvk . |
Masonry unit group |
Mortar |
fvko [MPa] |
Limiting fvk [MPa] |
1 clay |
M10-M20 |
0.3 |
1.7 |
| M2.5-M9 |
0.2 |
1.5 |
1 other |
M10-M20 |
0.2 |
1.7 |
| M2.5-M9 |
0.15 |
1.5 |
2a clay |
M10-M20 |
0.3 |
1.4 |
| M2.5-M9 |
0.2 |
1.2 |
2a other 2b clay |
M10-M20 |
0.2 |
1.4 |
| M2.5-M9 |
0.15 |
1.2 | |
|
Table 4- Shear strength at zero compression
fvko and limiting values of characteristic shear strength fvk (4) |
Another approach exists for
determining the shear resistance of plain masonry walls,
that lead to virtually same results. According to this approach, the shear failure
of masonry wall, ie. diagonal cracking of the wall, is caused by the principal tensile stresses.
The shear strength can be determined by reducing the masonry wall to a
structural element from elastic, homogeneous and isotropic material, experiencing plane stress
state. For this purpose are evaluated the principal compressive and tensile stresses,
respectively that develop in the middle section of the wall.
Thus the value of the principal tensile stresses, measured when the wall panel is loaded in shear
at failure, defines the tensile strength, ft.
The equations for principal compressive and the principal tensile stresses in
plain masonry wall panel under vertical load- N, and lateral load- H, are : |
| sc = SQRT((so/2)2+(b*t)2)+so/2 , |
| st = SQRT((so/2)2+(b*t)2)-so/2 , |
| And the plane of the principal stresses is defined as follows: |
| fc = ft = 0.5*ARCTAN(2*t/so), |
| where the meaning of symbols in the above equations are as follows: |
| so = N/Aw - average compressive stress due to vertical load N, |
| t = H/Aw - average shear stress due
to lateral load H, |
| Aw - the horizontal cross
section area of the wall, |
| b -
the shear stress distribution factor, depending on the
geometry of the wall and N/Hmax ratio. For a wall with
geometrical aspect ratio height/length=1.5, b=1.5 . |
| Hmax - the maximum resistance
of masonry wall |
| The principal tensile stress that develop in the wall at the
moment of maximum resistance- Hmax is called the tensile
strength of masonry: |
| ft = st = SQRT((so/2)2+(b*tHmax)2)-so/2 , |
In the
above equation ft is the
tensile strength of masonry and tHmax-
the average shear
stress in the wall at the attained maximum resistance
Hmax |
| The
lateral resistance Hs,w
of a plain masonry wall panel, loaded in shear is evaluated by : |
| Hs,w = Aw*(ft/b)*SQRT((so/ft)+1) |
| When
the resistance envelope is bilinear relationship, the
above equation is multiplied by a factor of 0.9. If the
design value of the shear resistance Hsd,w should be correlated
with the design seismic action, in the above equation
take part the characteristic value of tensile strength
and a material partial safety factor : |
| Hsd,w = Aw*(ftk/cM*b)*SQRT((sdcM/ftk)+1) |
There
is currently no standard testing procedure for
evaluating the shear strength fv or tensile strength ft.
One possibility is to use monotonic
diagonal compression test. Another test is subjecting
the wall panel to monotonic or cyclic racking load. The
effect of compressive stresses in the masonry is taken
into account in these tests. Table 5 shows values of
characteristic tensile strength of masonry -ftk correlated with values for
the initial shear strength at zero compressive stress- fvko |
Unit [MPa] |
Group |
Mortar [MPa] |
Strength [MPa] |
| ftk |
fvko |
| 10 |
1 - clay |
0.5 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
| 15 |
1 - clay |
2.5 |
0.18 |
0.20 |
| 7.5 |
2a - clay |
2 |
0.30 |
0.10 |
| 15 |
2a - clay |
2.5 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
| 15 |
2a - clay |
5 |
0.18 |
0.20 |
| 7.5 |
2a - other |
5 |
0.27 |
0.15 |
| 7.5 |
2a - other |
5 |
0.27 |
0.15 |
| 7.5 |
2b - clay |
3 |
0.10 |
0.20 | |
|
Table 5- Correlation between experimental
characteristic tensile strength ftk and initial shear strength
fvk0 of masonry (14) |
| By
analysing test results it has been established that the
ratio between the tensile and compressive strength of
any type of masonry varies in the following margins: |
|
0.03fk <= ftk <= 0.09fk |
| Bending strength |
| In
cases where the masonry needs to be verified for
out-of-plane loads the bending strength is the governing
factor. The bending strength parallel to bed joints (see Figure 9) is
denoteed with fx1 and
the bending strength perpendicular to bed joints (see Figure 8) is
denoted with fx2.
According to EC 6 the value of fx1 should be taken as zero
when evaluating seismic resistance. |
|
|
Figure 8- Vertical orientation of failure plane and corresponding bending strength normal to bed joints |
|
|
Figure 9- Horizontal orientation of failure plane and corresponding bending strength parallel to bed joints |
| Elastic properties |
The
modulus of elasticity E of masonry can be determined
after compression tests. The elastic modulus is defined
as a secant modulus at service load condition. This load
level corresponds to 1/3 of the maximum vertical
load. When determined by testing
E modulus value is not available the following equation
may be used : |
| E=1000fk |
| However in the calculated value of
E modulus may not be correct. Reliable E values are the
one in the margin: |
| 200fk <= E <= 2000fk |
| Theoretically and as specified in
EC 6 the G modulus is evaluated as being 40% of the E
modulus. In reality the values of shear modulus G are
much lower. Reliable G values are the one in the
margin: |
| 1000ftk <= G <= 2700ftk |
| The
discrepancy between experimental and predicted values
for the mechanical properties of masonry can be
explained with the composite nature of the material.
There are wide variety of not only masonry units but
also mortars and various composition of the masonry wall
itself. Therefore the testing of masonry is essential
step in seismic resistance verification of masonry
houses. |
| Planning and layout |
| To beginning of document |
Surveys of
earthquake damaged residential masonry wall houses
and analysis of the causes of damage indicate that well tied
buildings with
well defined, continuous load path to the foundations
perform much better in earthquakes than building lacking
such features. Well defined, continuous load path can be
achieved with regular structural layout and uniformity
both in plan and elevation. The degree of symmetry is
also found to have a significant influence on earthquake
resistance. Damage can be five to ten times worse in
irregular buildings compared to regular ones.
Thus
satisfactory seismic behaviour can be guaranteed by
following the requirements for regular and uniform
layout both in plan and elevation, interconnectivity
between structural members and strength of materials.
To summarise an earthquake resistant structural form
for masonry wall structure is the one which
is:
- Regular both in plan and
elevation i.e. uniform and symmetrical
- Redundant - capable of
providing adequate resistance even after a failure of
a structural member
- With rigid floors
interconnected with walls that ensure diaphragm action
- Stable foundation
should be provided able to transmit the maximum seismic loads
from the superstructure to the foundation soil
|
Masonry buildings with horizontal
irreguliarities and lack of symmetry may have
considerable eccentricity between the mass centre and
stiffness centre giving rise to damaging coupled
lateral/torsional response. Horizontal irregularities in
the form of extensions, projections etc. may cause
stress concentration and local failures since these
extensions are prone to vibrate separetely from the rest
of the structure. On the other
hand vertical irregularity in masonry building may cause
stress concentration at a horizontal plane that can lead
to total collapse. In order to achieve satisfactory
redundancy at least to lines of load bearing walls are
required in each principal direction of the building.
Lack of rigid floors will prevent proportionate load
transfer onto walls at each floor level as well as will
not provide out of plane restraint. Not supported
masonry walls at floor level tends to separate at
corners and/or fail out of their plane, causing collapse
of floor or roof. |
According to EC 8 the following
general criteria for structural regularity in plan and
elevation should be considered:
- The building structure is
approximately symmetrical along each principal axis in
plan, for both stiffness and mass distribution. A
sufficient number of load bearing walls with
approximately the same stiffness, should be provided
in both principal direction of the building -see Figure 10
|
|
Figure 10- Structural walls distribution in plan |
|
|