|
| |
|
The basic rules to be
followed and various requirements to be
satisfied for masonry construction are specified in
the codes of practice for structural masonry construction.
The information in this document is based on the European structural
design codes - EC6 and EC8. Eurocode 6 specifies the rules
and provisions for structural masonry.
Additional provisions to be considered for
masonry construction in earthquake regions are
outlined in Eurocode 8.
The discussion in this section
aims at achieving safe unreinforced masonry houses constructed from burnt clay brick units.
The following main points should be followed when constructing earthquake resistant plain brick masonry:
|
|
| Materials for masonry construction |
| Masonry units |
EC6 gives
specifications regarding the use of the following masonry
units:
- Fired clay units
- Fired clay lightweight units
- Calcium silicate units
- Concrete block units
- Lightweight concrete block units
- Autoclaved aerated concrete units
- Dimensioned natural stone units
|
| The
properties of masonry units should comply with the
requirements of relevant European standards (EN
771-1-6). Masonry units are classified into the
following types: solid, perforated unit, hollow unit,
cellular unit and horizontally perforated unit- see Figure 1. |
|
|
Figure 1- Types of masonry units (7) |
| Solid
masonry units are either units without recesses or units
with recesses that are filled with mortar during
construction, or units with up to 25% by volume of
vertical holes. Considering the total volume of holes,
volume of any hole, area of any hole, as well as
combined thickness of webs and shells, EC6 provides the
following classification (Table 1): |
| Criteria |
1 |
2a |
2b |
3 |
Volume of holes (% of the gross volume)1 |
<=25 |
>25-45 for clay units, >25-50 for concrete aggregate units |
>45-55 for clay units, >50-60 for concrete aggregate units2 |
<=70 |
Volume of any hole(% of the gross volume) |
<=12.5 |
<=12.5 for clay units, <=25 for concrete aggregate units |
<=12.5 for clay units, <=25 for concrete aggregate units2 |
Limited by (see below) |
Area of any hole |
Limited by volume (see above) |
Limited by volume (see above) |
Limited by volume (see above) |
<=2800mm2 except units with a single hole when the hole should be <=18000mm2 |
Combined thickness (% of the overall width)3 |
>=37.5 |
>=30 |
>=20 |
No requirement |
Notes: 1.
Holes may consist of formed vertical holes through
the unit or frogs or recesses. 2. If there is national
experience, based on tests, that confirms that the
safety of the masonry is not reduced unacceptably
when a higher proportion of holes is incorporated,
the limit of 55% for clay units and 60% for
concrete aggregate units may be increased for
masonry units that are used in the country with
national experience. 3.The combined thickness is the thickness of webs
and shells, measured horizontally across the unit
at right angles to the face of the wall | |
|
Table 1- EC 6 requirements for the grouping of masonry units |
| This classification is employed to
select the corection factor K in cases where the
characteristic compressive strength fk and shear strength
fvk of the masonry are
calculated on the basis of empirical formulae
correlating normalised compressive strength of masonry
units fb and mortar fm. |
EC 8 provides further requirements
for hollow units used for earthquake resistant masonry
construction as listed:
- The units have less than 50% holes(in % of gross volume)
- Minimum thickness of shells is 15mm
- The vertical webs in hollow and cellular units extend over the entire horizontal
length of the unit
|
In the relevant European standards
(EN 771-1-6) are given minimum mean values of
compressive strength of masonry units to be used for
masonry walls:
- Clay units: min fb=2.5 MPa
- Calcium silicate units: min fb=5.0 MPa
- Concrete units: min fb=1.8 MPa
- Autoclaved aerated concrete units: min fb=1.8 MPa
|
According to the EC 8, the minimum
normalised compressive strength of masonry unit, normal
to the bed face, is fb=2.5 MPa. In the case of
hollow clay units and concrete block units it is
recommended that the minimum compressive strength is 7.5
MPa, especially for reinforced masonry walls
construction. EC 6 suggests the use of normalised
compressive strength fb
for design. This is the mean value determined by testing
of at least ten equivalent, air dried, 100 mm by 100 mm
specimens cut from the masonry unit. In the case where
the strength is obtained by testing full sized units,
the mean value of strength is multiplied by the shape
factor d,
which takes into account the actual dimensions of the
unit. In case the compressive stength of masonry is
specified as characteristic strength, it should be first
converted to the mean equivalent using a conversion
factor based on the coefficient of variation, and than
multiplied by the shape factor d. |
| Table 2, below displays shape factor d
values. |
| Height [mm] |
Least horizontal dimension [mm] |
| 50 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
>250 |
| 50 |
0.85 |
0.75 |
0.70 |
- |
- |
| 65 |
0.95 |
0.85 |
0.75 |
0.70 |
0.65 |
| 100 |
1.15 |
1.00 |
0.90 |
0.80 |
0.75 |
| 150 |
1.30 |
1.20 |
1.10 |
1.00 |
0.95 |
| 200 |
1.45 |
1.35 |
1.25 |
1.15 |
1.10 |
| >250 |
1.55 |
1.45 |
1.35 |
1.25 |
1.15 | |
|
Table 2- Shape factor for
conversion of mean value of unit's strength to
normalised value (4) |
| Mortar |
According to the specification used
in EC 6, several types of mortar can be used for masonry
walls:
- General purpose mortar, used in joints with thickness greater than 3mm and produced with dense aggregate
- Thin layer mortar, which is designed for use in masonry with nominal thickness of joints 1-3mm
- Lightweight mortar, which is made using perlite, expanded clay, expanded shale etc.
Lightweight mortars typically have a dry hardened density lower than 1500kg/m3.
|
| In Table 3 below are shown
typical composition of prescribed general purpose mortar
mixes and expected mean compressive strength. |
| Mortar type |
Mean compresive strength |
Approximate composition in parts of volume |
| Cement |
Hydrated lime |
Sand |
| M2 |
2.5 MPa |
1 |
1.25-2.50 |
2.25-3 times cement and lime |
| M5 |
5 MPa |
1 |
0.50-1.25 |
| M10 |
10 MPa |
1 |
0.25-0.50 |
| M20 |
20 MPa |
1 |
0-0.25 | |
|
Table 3- Typical prescribed
composition and strength of general purpose
mortars (39) |
| Mortars to be used in masonry
construction in earthquake regions should comply with EC
8. According to this standard for the construction of
plain and confined masonry, the minimum compressive
strength of mortar fm is set to 5 MPa. |
| Mechanical properties of mortar are
determined by testing mortar prisms 40x40x160mm
(EN1015-11). The compressive strength of the mortar is
calculated after averaging the strength values of six
specimens. The thickness of bed and head joints is
recommended to be in the range 8-15mm and all head
joints should be fully filled with mortar. |
| Definition of brick masonry construction systems |
| To beginning of document |
Brick masonry houses are structures
defined by vertical and horizontal elements,
respectively walls and floors. Since the main service
loads are applied on the floors the seismic forces will
be mainly concentrated at each floor level. Floors
should be rigid in their plane to distribute the seismic
load among the vertical wall elements in proportion to their
stiffness. Such floors are referred to as horizontal
diaphragms. However diaphragms alone will be inadequate
unless good connection between them and the supporting walls
exists.
When constructing RC slabs, casting of bond-beams just below floor
level is economic and efficient solution.
Good floor to wall connection can also be achieved by designing
steel ties between timber floor joists and supporting wall.
|
In EC6 are discussed the following types of masonry walls, as shown on Figure 2:
- Single-leaf wall- defined as
a wall without continous vertical joint or cavity
- Double-leaf wall- defined as
a wall constitued from two parallel leaves and a joint
between them max 25 mm, filled with mortar. The leaves
can be tied together with steel wall ties to achieve
solid wall cross section
- Cavity wall- defined as a
wall constructed of two parallel single-leaf walls,
tied together with wall ties or bed joint
reinforcement. One or both leaves can be load-bearing.
The cavity between the leaves can be filled, or
partially-filled, with non-load bearing insulation
material
- Grouted cavity wall- defined
as a wall like the cavity wall but the two leaves are
spaced min 50 mm apart and are tied securely in place
with steel wall ties and bed joint reinforcement, and
with a cavity filled with concrete.
|
|
|
Figure 2- Cross section of a single leaf(half brick), single leaf(whole brick), double leaf and cavity wall |
| Unreinforced- ie. Plain clay brick masonry |
Unreinforced clay brick masonry is a traditional form for construction
of low-rise houses that has been extensively practiced in almost every part of the world.
With the increased popularity and availability of reinforced concrete, improved masonry forms
of construction, like confined and reinforced masonry became more common for low-rise houses.
However traditional houses with load-bearing system of unreinforced burnt clay brick walls are
still being constructed in many areas of Asia, Indian Subcontinent and Latin America.
This type of housing can be vulnerable to the earthquake shaking unless all rules
and recommendations in this guide are followed.
Brick masonry should be constructed following
simple instructions for quality workmanship:
- In dry and hot climate,
masonry units should be soaked in water before the
construction in order to prevent quick drying and
shrinkage of cement based mortars
- Masonry units should be
assembled together in overlapped fashion (see Figure 3 and Figure 4 ) so that the vertical joints are
staggered from course to course. To ensure adequate
bonding the units should overlap by a lenght equal to
0.4 times the height of unit or 40 mm, whichever is
the greater. At the corners and wall intersections the
overlap should be min the width of the units.
|
|
Figure 3- Flemish bond for one brick thick wall |
|
|
Figure 4- English bond for one brick thick wall |
In seismic zones, it is recommended that the minimum
thickness of load-bearing walls is 240 mm. To
ensure stability of walls, the ratio of the effective
wall height to wall thickness should be max 15 . |
| Openings in plain masonry walls should be
limited to ensure load bearing capacity. Therefore the length of a structural wall should be at
least 1/2 of the greater clear height of the openings
adjacent to the wall. |
| Mechanical properties for verification of masonry walls |
| To beginning of document |
| This part of the document explains the mechanical properties of masonry
for verification of masonry walls. This section is included in cases where engineered building is required. |
| Earthquake resistance of masonry walls |
In the event of an earthquake, apart from the existing gravity loads, horizontal racking loads are imposed on walls.
However, the unreinforced masonry behaves as a brittle material. Hence if the stress state within the wall exceeds masonry strength, brittle failure occurs,
followed by possible collapse of the wall and the building. Therefore unreinforced masonry walls are vulnerable to earthquakes,
and should be confined and/or reinforced whenever possible. Nevertheless, low-rise residential plain masonry construction limited to
the specifications provided in this document and including certain earthquake-resistant details can still be safe.
Masonry walls resisting in-plane loads usually exhibit the following three modes of failure:
- Sliding shear- a wall with poor shear strength, loaded predominantly with horizontal forces
can exhibit this failure mechanism. Aspect ratio for such walls is usually 1:1 or less (1:1.5)
- Shear- a wall loaded with significant vertical load as well as horizontal forces can fail in shear.
This is the most common mode of failure. Aspect ratio for such walls is usually about 1:1. Shear failure
can also occur for panels with bigger aspect ratio ie. 2:1, in cases of big vertical load.
- Bending- this type of failure can occur if walls are with improved shear resistance.
For bigger aspect ratios ie. 2:1 bending failure can occur due to small vertical loads, rather than
high shear resistance. In this mode of failure the masonry panel can rock like a rigid body (in cases of low
vertical loads).
Failure modes for masonry walls subject to in-plane loads are shown on Figure 5 |
|
|
Figure 5- Failure modes for masonry walls subject to in-plane loads |
| Mechanical properties |
In order to estimate the resistance of masonry walls, the following mechanical properties for
the masonry needs to be determined:
- The compressive strength- f
- The shear strength- fv
- The bending strength- fx
- The stress-strain relationship, s-e
|
Other essential mechanical characteristics of masonry:
- The tensile strength- ft, as an equivalent to shear strength- fv
- The modulus of elasticity- E
- The shear modulus- G
- The ductility factor- m
|
| The ductility factor is determined
only for a specific structural element(specific
proportions, boundary conditions etc). It cannot be
determined for the masonry itself. Mechanical
characteristics of masonry are determined by testing
standard specimens of masonry wallets and walls
according to code EN 1052. |
| Compressive strength |
Compressive strength is
determined by testing masonry specimens of at least 1.5
units length and 3 units height or by testing walls of
1.0-1.8 m length and 2.4-2.7 m height.
In cases where
the masonry specimen is slender(height/thickness>20),
lateral displacements at the mid height of the wall are
measured. The slenderness can be taken into account
using the measured value for this displacement d and the
thickness of the wall t. Thus the measured compressive
strength can be increased by the following factor:
t/(t-d),
provided the increase is not more than 15%.
According to
EN 1052-1 three identical specimens are tested and the
results evaluated. In cases where the measured mean
compressive strength f of masonry is different from the
one of its constituents( masonry units and mortar) by
25% the value of f is modified. The characteristic
compressive strength of masonry fk is determined as the
smaller value of either fk=f/1.2 or fk=fmin.
When verifying load
bearing masonry and test data is not available, the
characteristic compressive strength of plain masonry
made with general purpose mortar may be calculated on
the basis of normalised compressive strength of masonry
units fb and compressive
strength of mortar fm as
follows: |
| fk = K*(fb0.65)*(fm0.25) [MPa], |
and fm is less than 20 MPa
or 2fb, whichever is the
smaller. The value of constant K depends on the
classification of masonry units into groups as per Table 1.
Below are shown recommended values for K:
- 0.60 for group 1 masonry units in a wall without longitudinal mortar joint,
- 0.55 for group 2a masonry units in a wall without longitudinal mortar joint,
- 0.50 for group 2b masonry units in a wall without longitudinal mortar joint, and
for group 1 masonry units in a wall with longitudinal mortar joint,
- 0.45 for group 2a masonry units in a wall with longitudinal mortar joint,
- 0.40 for group 2b masonry units in a wall with longitudinal mortar joint, and
for group 3 masonry units
|
| Shear strength |
| Shear strength of masonry is
defined as a combination of initial shear strength under
zero compressive load and increase in strength due to
compressive stresses perpendicular to the shear plane.
Initial shear strength at zero compressive stress is
denoted with fvko. This
property is determined according to EN 1052-3 by testing
a triplet specimen such that only shear stresses develop
in the mortar to masonry unit contact planes. A minimum
of five triplets are tested. The minimum acceptable
value of fvko is 0.03
MPa. The characteristic shear strength of plain masonry
is then calculated as follows: |
| fvk = fvko+0.4*sd, |
| where sd is the design compressive
stress perpendicular to the shear plane. The value of
sd should be greater than
0.065fb and a limiting
value specified in EC 6 depending on masonry unit's
group and mortar quality. In Table 4, are shown
typical values of initial shear strength at zero
compression fvko and
limiting values of characteristic shear strength fvk . |
Masonry unit group |
Mortar |
fvko [MPa] |
Limiting fvk [MPa] |
1 clay |
M10-M20 |
0.3 |
1.7 |
| M2.5-M9 |
0.2 |
1.5 |
1 other |
M10-M20 |
0.2 |
1.7 |
| M2.5-M9 |
0.15 |
1.5 |
2a clay |
M10-M20 |
0.3 |
1.4 |
| M2.5-M9 |
0.2 |
1.2 |
2a other 2b clay |
M10-M20 |
0.2 |
1.4 |
| M2.5-M9 |
0.15 |
1.2 | |
|
Table 4- Shear strength at zero compression
fvko and limiting values of characteristic shear strength fvk (4) |
Another approach exists for
determining the shear resistance of plain masonry walls,
that lead to virtually same results. According to this approach, the shear failure
of masonry wall, ie. diagonal cracking of the wall, is caused by the principal tensile stresses.
The shear strength can be determined by reducing the masonry wall to a
structural element from elastic, homogeneous and isotropic material, experiencing plane stress
state. For this purpose are evaluated the principal compressive and tensile stresses,
respectively that develop in the middle section of the wall.
Thus the value of the principal tensile stresses, measured when the wall panel is loaded in shear
at failure, defines the tensile strength, ft.
The equations for principal compressive and the principal tensile stresses in
plain masonry wall panel under vertical load- N, and lateral load- H, are : |
| sc = SQRT((so/2)2+(b*t)2)+so/2 , |
| st = SQRT((so/2)2+(b*t)2)-so/2 , |
| And the plane of the principal stresses is defined as follows: |
| fc = ft = 0.5*ARCTAN(2*t/so), |
| where the meaning of symbols in the above equations are as follows: |
| so = N/Aw - average compressive stress due to vertical load N, |
| t = H/Aw - average shear stress due
to lateral load H, |
| Aw - the horizontal cross
section area of the wall, |
| b -
the shear stress distribution factor, depending on the
geometry of the wall and N/Hmax ratio. For a wall with
geometrical aspect ratio height/length=1.5, b=1.5 . |
| Hmax - the maximum resistance
of masonry wall |
| The principal tensile stress that develop in the wall at the
moment of maximum resistance- Hmax is called the tensile
strength of masonry: |
| ft = st = SQRT((so/2)2+(b*tHmax)2)-so/2 , |
In the
above equation ft is the
tensile strength of masonry and tHmax-
the average shear
stress in the wall at the attained maximum resistance
Hmax |
| The
lateral resistance Hs,w
of a plain masonry wall panel, loaded in shear is evaluated by : |
| Hs,w = Aw*(ft/b)*SQRT((so/ft)+1) |
| When
the resistance envelope is bilinear relationship, the
above equation is multiplied by a factor of 0.9. If the
design value of the shear resistance Hsd,w should be correlated
with the design seismic action, in the above equation
take part the characteristic value of tensile strength
and a material partial safety factor : |
| Hsd,w = Aw*(ftk/cM*b)*SQRT((sdcM/ftk)+1) |
There
is currently no standard testing procedure for
evaluating the shear strength fv or tensile strength ft.
One possibility is to use monotonic
diagonal compression test. Another test is subjecting
the wall panel to monotonic or cyclic racking load. The
effect of compressive stresses in the masonry is taken
into account in these tests. Table 5 shows values of
characteristic tensile strength of masonry -ftk correlated with values for
the initial shear strength at zero compressive stress- fvko |
Unit [MPa] |
Group |
Mortar [MPa] |
Strength [MPa] |
| ftk |
fvko |
| 10 |
1 - clay |
0.5 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
| 15 |
1 - clay |
2.5 |
0.18 |
0.20 |
| 7.5 |
2a - clay |
2 |
0.30 |
0.10 |
| 15 |
2a - clay |
2.5 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
| 15 |
2a - clay |
5 |
0.18 |
0.20 |
| 7.5 |
2a - other |
5 |
0.27 |
0.15 |
| 7.5 |
2a - other |
5 |
0.27 |
0.15 |
| 7.5 |
2b - clay |
3 |
0.10 |
0.20 | |
|
Table 5- Correlation between experimental
characteristic tensile strength ftk and initial shear strength
fvk0 of masonry (14) |
| By
analysing test results it has been established that the
ratio between the tensile and compressive strength of
any type of masonry varies in the following margins: |
|
0.03fk <= ftk <= 0.09fk |
| Bending strength |
| In
cases where the masonry needs to be verified for
out-of-plane loads the bending strength is the governing
factor. The bending strength parallel to bed joints (see Figure 7) is
denoteed with fx1 and
the bending strength perpendicular to bed joints (see Figure 6) is
denoted with fx2.
According to EC 6 the value of fx1 should be taken as zero
when evaluating seismic resistance. |
|
|
Figure 6- Vertical orientation of failure plane and corresponding bending strength normal to bed joints |
|
|
Figure 7- Horizontal orientation of failure plane and corresponding bending strength parallel to bed joints |
|
| Elastic properties |
The
modulus of elasticity E of masonry can be determined
after compression tests. The elastic modulus is defined
as a secant modulus at service load condition. This load
level corresponds to 1/3 of the maximum vertical
load. When determined by testing
E modulus value is not available the following equation
may be used : |
| E=1000fk |
| However in the calculated value of
E modulus may not be correct. Reliable E values are the
one in the margin: |
| 200fk <= E <= 2000fk |
| Theoretically and as specified in
EC 6 the G modulus is evaluated as being 40% of the E
modulus. In reality the values of shear modulus G are
much lower. Reliable G values are the one in the
margin: |
| 1000ftk <= G <= 2700ftk |
| The
discrepancy between experimental and predicted values
for the mechanical properties of masonry can be
explained with the composite nature of the material.
There are wide variety of not only masonry units but
also mortars and various composition of the masonry wall
itself. Therefore the testing of masonry is essential
step in seismic resistance verification of masonry
houses. |
| Planning and layout for masonry houses |
| To beginning of document |
Surveys of
earthquake damaged residential unreinforced brick masonry wall houses
and its analysis proved that well tied
buildings with
well defined, continuous load path to the foundations
perform much better in earthquakes than building lacking
such features. Well defined continuous load path can be
achieved with regular structural layout and uniformity
both in plan and elevation. The degree of symmetry is
also found to have a significant influence on earthquake
resistance. Damage can be five to ten times worse in
irregular buildings compared to regular ones.
Thus
satisfactory seismic behaviour can be guaranteed by
following the requirements for regular and uniform
layout both in plan and elevation, interconnectivity
between structural members and strength of materials.
To summarise an earthquake resistant structural form
for masonry wall structure is the one which
is:
- Regular both in plan and
elevation i.e. uniform and symmetrical
- Redundant - capable of
providing adequate resistance even after a failure of
a structural member
- With rigid floors
interconnected with walls that ensure diaphragm action
- Stable foundation
should be provided able to transmit the maximum seismic loads
from the superstructure to the foundation soil
|
Masonry buildings with horizontal
irreguliarities and lack of symmetry may have
considerable eccentricity between the mass centre and
stiffness centre giving rise to damaging coupled
lateral/torsional response. Horizontal irregularities in
the form of extensions, projections etc. may cause
stress concentration and local failures since these
extensions are prone to vibrate separetely from the rest
of the structure. On the other
hand vertical irregularity in masonry building may cause
stress concentration at a horizontal plane that can lead
to total collapse. In order to achieve satisfactory
redundancy at least to lines of load bearing walls are
required in each principal direction of the building.
Lack of rigid floors will prevent proportionate load
transfer onto walls at each floor level as well as will
not provide out of plane restraint. Not supported
masonry walls at floor level tends to separate at
corners and/or fail out of their plane, causing collapse
of floor or roof. |
According to EC 8 the following
general criteria for structural regularity in plan and
elevation should be considered:
- The building structure is
approximately symmetrical along each principal axis in
plan, for both stiffness and mass distribution. A
sufficient number of load bearing walls with
approximately the same stiffness, should be provided
in both principal direction of the building -see Figure 8
|
|
Figure 8- Structural walls distribution in plan |
|
|
Figure 14- Detail of RC bond beam showing splicing of rebars at wall corners |
| According to EC 8 the resistance of the RC bond-beam should not be taken
into consideration in the design calculations. Consequantly there is no mandatory design through calculation for the bond-beams.
As was discussed in the confined masonry section the design parameters are determined on empirical basis. In Table 10 the members reinforcement
can be determined based on the seismicity of the location the number of stroreys and position. |
Number of storeys |
Position (storey) |
Low: < 0.2 [g] |
Moderate: 0.2 - 0.3 [g] |
High: >= 0.3 [g] |
| 2 |
1-2 |
4 bars, f8 mm |
4 bars, f10 mm |
4 bars, f12 mm |
| 4 |
1-2 |
4 bars, f10 mm |
4 bars, f12 mm |
4 bars, f14 mm |
| 4 |
2-4 |
4 bars, f8 mm |
4 bars, f10 mm |
4 bars, f12 mm |
| 6 |
1-2 |
4 bars, f12 mm |
4 bars, f14 mm |
4 bars, f16 mm |
| 6 |
3-4 |
4 bars, f10 mm |
4 bars, f12 mm |
4 bars, f14 mm |
| 6 |
5-6 |
4 bars, f8 mm |
4 bars, f10 mm |
4 bars, f12 mm |
|
|
Table 10 Recommended reinforcement of horizontal RC bond-beams (9) |
| Floors and roofs |
Traditionally the masonry buildings had a timber floor and roof. However, currently are predominantly used RC slabs for floors in residential masonry construction.
In EC 8 it is specified that the floor and roof structure can be constructed in timber or reinforced concrete, provided a diaphragm action
can be achieved.
Apart from developing diaphragm action and transfer of the seismic forces onto the walls the floors and roof
should support the walls out of their plane, ie. all structural walls should be restrained at floor/roof level.
In the case of RC slab the connection is provided by constructing RC bond beam onto the structural walls.
In the case of a timber joist floor the floor joists should be tied to the walls by means of steel ties.
The anchoring of the timber floor joists to masonry walls may be more difficult to achieve. Twisted steel anchors anchored in the masonry can be used to tie the joists to the walls.
Timber joists can be directly anchored
to the RC bond-beam in the case when steel ties are placed into position in the formwork and cast together with the bond-beam.
Details for anchorage of timber floor joists to walls with steel ties, as well as steel wall ties, used for tying together the walls of
existent masonry buildings, to improve wall-to-wall conection. To find out more about this technique
visit Repair and Strengthening of brick/block masonry houses.
The construction of monolithic RC slabs is recommended. The slabs are cast together with the bond beams.
Floor systems made of prefabricated RC elements and cast in situ topping are not recommended.
When floors are constructed in timber special detailing is required both to ensure diaphragm action and to restraint the walls out-of-plane.
Solid strutting inline or staggered can be incorporated between joists in addition to nailing of boarding to stiffen the floor.
The boarding can be from plywood sheets and can be nailed to joists at the top and/or the bottom surface depending on access.
Other than plywood timber planks can also be nailed to joists to form continous boarding as shown on Figure 15. |
|
|
Figure 15- Stiffening of timber floors by nailing boards or planks |
| Common roof systems constructed in timber for low-rise masonry housing are the joist-rafter roof and the truss roof.
The joist-rafter roof system tends to spread and overturn masonry walls. Therefore a collar beam attached to rafters is required.
To ensure diaphragm action bracing and blocking should be constructed both in the plane of the joists and in the plane of the rafters in two
othogonal directions. Only the perimeter joists and rafters may be included in bracing and blocking. Vertical cross bracing in
the longitudinal ridge plane( perpendiculiar to the joists) is also required.
To achieve a satisfactory restraint on the walls the ceiling joists should be anchored to the provided RC roof bond beam
by means of steel strap placed in position in the bond-beam's formwork before casting of the bond-beam. See Figure 16 |
|
|
Figure 16- Timber roof anchorage to bond beam |
| RC roofs can be also constructed. They can be both flat RC slabs or sloped systems cast together with the roof bond beam.
These roofs can provide diaphragm action and wall restraint however their mass is much higher.
In order to reduce seismic loads light roofs are favoured. Light roof cover( tiles) should be used preferably. |
| Lintels and cantilever elements |
| Lintels are load-bearing elements which support the weight of the wall and floor above opening.
Lintels can be made from in-situ reinforced concrete, timber and reinforced masonry. In seismic zones cast in-situ RC lintels are recommended.
If the distance between the top of the opening to the top of the floor above is less than 600 mm the lintel can be cast
simultaneously with the bond beam and floor slab as shown on Figure 17. In cases where the distance is bigger the lintels can
be cast separately(Figure 17) and care should be taken to bond the RC lintels to the masonry of the adjoining wall through
horizontal rebars. |
|
|
Figure 17- Requirements for lintels in seismic zones (9) |
| Where the area of the opening is more than 2.5 m2, tie-columns are required on both sides
of opening. The reinforcement of lintels should be anchored into the rc tie-columns. It is also recommended that lintels should be embedded in the walls
a minimum of 250 mm. The lintel width should be equal to the wall thickness and should not be less than 150 mm. |
Cantilever structural elements in masonry houses like balconies and various forms of
overhangs are vulnerable in an event of an earthquake. These portions of the structure are iinherently
flexible in vertical direction( out-of-plane) and are prone to vibrate separately from the rest of the structure
during an earthquake. In order to reduce vertical motion of balconies, overhangs and other cantilever elements the
following limitations are set:
- 1.20 m for cantilever slabs cast continuously with the floor slabs, and
- 0.50 m for cantilever slabs anchored into the bond-beams without the continuity with the floor slab
|
Design of bigger cantilevers is possible however a rigorous analysis is required accounting
for the vertical component of the seismic motion. According to EC 8 when verifying a portion of the structure on the vertical component
of seismic motion a partial model is adequate including the cantilever element and taking into account the stiffness
of the adjacent elements to ensure realistic boundary conditions. According to EC 8 the response spectrum as defined in previous section is
applicable but with the following corrections:
- For periods T < 0.15s the ordinates of the spectrum are multiplied by 0.7
- For periods 0.15s < T < 0.5s a linearly interpolated value between 0.7 and 0.5
- For periods T > 0.5s the ordinates of the spectrum are multiplied by 0.5
|
| Non-load bearing elements |
Failures of non-load bearing elements, such as partition walls, chimneys, masonry veneer, architectural details, etc, can cause casualties and structural damage.
In order to prevent failure and fall-downs of masonry non-structural elements their out-of-plane stability to seimic loads should be verified by calculation according to EC8.
Partition walls are made of most types of masonry units including solid ones. The usual partition walls thickness is about 100 mm and they can be plain or reinforced. The reinforcing can be by means of rebars f4 to f6
placed in the masonry bed joints every 500 mm. The partition walls are usually confined in vertical direction by the floors through cement based mortar joints. In horizontal direction the partitions are confined from RC tie-columns or structural walls through steel anchors or
just bond.
When constructing timber ridged roof, the triangular area formed by the sloping ends of the roof can be filled with masonry forming a gable end wall. Out-of-plane failures of gable end walls are common during strong earthquakes and therefore require special consideration.
It is recommended that masonry gable end walls and attics higher than 0.5 m are anchored to the uppermost floor bond-beams.
The gable end walls should be confined by a bond beam running along the roof line. In cases where the height of the gable end wall
is more than 4 m, intermidiate bond-beams should be added not more than 2m apart. As discussed in the confined masonry section
the maximum distance between vertical confining elements is 4 m.
For architectural purposes external solid walls can be constructed as faced or veneered walls.
The faced wall is built with different masonry units bonded together to achieve common action under loading.
Veneered walls has facing attached, but not bonded to the backing leaf. The load applied to veneered wall is assumed
to be carried by the backing leaf only which is designed on the basis of no structural contribution from the veneer.
The veneer can be anchored by means of steel ties to the backing masonry wall. No specific requirements can be found in EC 8 however its stability
can be verified using the formulaes applied to out-of-plane stability of partition walls.
Heavy masonry chimneys and ventilation stacks represent a considerable hazard in the event of an earthquake. If the chimney is not built of reinforced masonry
an effective solution might be to deconstruct it and complete it in reinforced masonry or replace it altogether with a lighter metal chimney.
In the case of reinforced masonry chimney the rebars should be anchored into the top floor. Architectural details, like cornices, vertical or horizontal cantiliver projections, etc., should be reinforced
and anchored into the main RC strucure. The out-of-plane behaviour should be verified by calculation according to the guidance provided for partition walls. |
| To beginning of document |
| |
| |